Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2000 51(204):600-616; doi:10.1093/res/51.204.600
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barry, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Coleridge the revisionary surrogacy and structure in the conversation poems

P Barry

University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK

Coleridge's conversation poems belong to what can be called the inner canonical core of English literature, and writing about such texts presents special problems, for critics can find themselves most intensely engaged not with the work itself but with the dense body of critical material surrounding it. Some form of radical 'defamiliarization' device is needed to disengage the text from the critical corpus, yet without lapsing back into a naive textual formalism. Eclectic use of critical theory can perform this vital defamiliarizing function. This article therefore uses elements of prose narratology as a way of re-engaging with these poems. It asserts that the poems in the group all have a four-part structure, the four parts here being labelled the 'locatory prelude', the 'transposition', the 'self-reproof', and the 'resolution'. Further, it is claimed that all these poems centre on the notion of surrogacy, whereby a silent figure, at first contrasted with the speaker, becomes, as the poem unfolds, part of a composite self, sharing a common subjectivity with him. These matters are first demonstrated with reference to The Eolian Harp', followed by a briefer consideration of the remaining poems, primarily aimed at showing the various forms of surrogacy seen in the group as a whole.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.