Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2001 52(206):195-206; doi:10.1093/res/52.206.195
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Considine, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Narrative and Persuasion in Early Modern English Dictionaries and Phrasebooks

John Considine1

1 University of Alberta

The dictionaries (and phrasebooks: the distinction is sometimes a very fine one) made in the early modern period were intended to be read more or less consecutively. They told stories, and they persuaded their readers to adopt beliefs and perform actions. Sir Thomas Elyot's Dictionary of 1538, for instance, argued for the importance of learned men, and particularly of Elyot himself, in the state; this argument was made more strongly in Thomas Cooper's Thesaurus of 1565. Polyglot dictionaries suggested the interchangeability of ideas from one language to another, and therefore had irenical implications. So did two seventeenth-century phrasebooks, Marten Le Mayre's of Dutch (1606) and Roger Williams's of Narragansett (1643), both of which promoted very specific agendas of peacemaking and missionary work. John Cowell's censored Interpreter (1607) argued for absolute monarchy, and Henry Manwayring's Sea-Mans Dictionary (1644) for English naval expansion. Each of these wordbooks served a political function as well as a linguistic one: they were meant to change people's lives.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.