Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2001 52(206):207-226; doi:10.1093/res/52.206.207
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannan, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A Short View of Tragedy and Rymer's Proposals for Regulating the English Stage

Paul D. Cannan1

1 University of Minnesota Duluth

Thomas Rymer's A Short View of Tragedy (1693) is one of the most infamous texts in the history of English literary criticism. Its adverse reception is largely attributable to the understandable but undue attention Rymer's contemporaries and modern scholars have paid to its most radical parts: Rymer's proposal for reinstating the ancient chorus and his attack on Shakespeare. But between these two sections are five chapters on the history of tragedy that are consistently neglected. Identifying the controlling thesis of Rymer's historical narrative reveals that, far from being a simple attack on Shakespeare or advocating naive subservience to the ancients, A Short View is an appeal for increased government support and regulation of the English stage. In this context, Shakespeare appears as a cautionary example demonstrating what Rymer believed were the ill effects of an unsupervised and self-serving playwright, and the chorus is offered as an effective and aesthetically pleasing means of regulating both the production and reception of drama. Considered in its entirety and with regard to method and purpose, A Short View reveals itself as an early and important contribution to a larger print debate about the reform of English drama.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.