Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2001 52(207):341-359; doi:10.1093/res/52.207.341
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cathcart, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Article

Hamlet: Date and Early Afterlife

Charles Cathcart1

1 Blackburn

Echoes of Hamlet are present in two plays of winter 1599/1600: Antonio and Mellida and Lust's Dominion. Correspondences between Hamlet and each of these plays are too strong to be coincidental, and they offer clear evidence of direction. The comic genre of Antonio and Mellida, and the existence of distinctive material shared by Hamlet and both Antonio plays, makes the prospect of a common source for these plays (such as the lost ur-Hamlet) an improbable hypothesis. The evidence for the dates of the debtor plays is powerful. The permeation of their texts by Hamlet's lines is so widespread that a possible influence in the course of any revisions subsequent to 1599/1600 may be discounted. If the arguments outlined above are sound, then we must accept a Shakespearian Hamlet composed by the end of 1599. This is not inconsistent with other evidence for Hamlet's date. The suggested date offers a sharpened context for Hamlet's inception, and—as context confers meaning—invites a clearer understanding of the tragedy. The evidence of indebtedness, if valid, itself constitutes the play's immediate surviving afterlife.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.