Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2002 53(211):365-373; doi:10.1093/res/53.211.365
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steggle, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Redating A Jovial Crew

Matthew Steggle1

1 Sheffield Hallam University

A Jovial Crew is usually dated to spring 1641, on the strength of internal references to spring, and the first edition's note that the play was first performed in 1641. This article contests that date, using the parallel case of Brome's The Sparagus Garden: because Brome's dating follows the civic and not the calendar year, A Jovial Crew can be dated as late as March 1642. This in turn simplifies other problems relating to theatrical politics, to Brome's own career, and to topical reference. In particular, it aligns the play far more closely with Shirley's The Sisters, and opens up the possibility of reading both plays as responses to the king's departure from London at the start of 1642 in order to muster his strength in the north—a reading already recognized in the case of The Sisters. Finally, it permits a new approach to the question of the end of the Caroline theatre. Existing accounts of the theatre of 1641 tend to use A Jovial Crew as defining evidence, and suggest that the year was a prolonged final agony; redating the play invites as rereading of the other drama of 1641.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.