Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2005 56(224):224-246; doi:10.1093/res/hgi050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, MacD. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved

Articles

Francis Meres and the Cultural Contexts of Shakespeare's Rival Poet Sonnets

MacD. P. Jackson

University of Auckland

Shakespeare's sonnets 78–86 concern the Speaker's rivalry with other poets and especially with one ‘better spirit’ who is ‘learned’ and ‘polished’. Correct dating of these sonnets (1598–1600), on evidence independent of any supposed identifications of historical personages, allows profitable exploration of the cultural context in which they were written. The conclusions are not that any single historical writer was the Rival Poet, but that around 1599 Shakespeare had special reason to compare his achievements with those of Marlowe, Chapman, Jonson, and others, who posed various kinds of threats to his pre-eminence, even though Marlowe was by then no more than ‘a familiar ghost’. Francis Meres's ‘Comparative Discourse’ in his Palladis Tamia (1598), in particular, provided such a strong stimulus towards the creation of the Rival Poet group as to constitute a definite source.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.