Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2005 56(226):524-549; doi:10.1093/res/hgi080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tilmouth, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved

Burton's ‘Turning Picture’: Argument and Anxiety in The Anatomy of Melancholy

Christopher Tilmouth

Corpus Christi College, Cambridge

Burton's Anatomy is built around a coherent analysis of melancholy. It presents a consistent explanation of the properties and pathology of melancholy, relating these to a lucid model of mind–body interaction which also accounts for the disease's self-propagating nature. Furthermore, Burton differentiates between those who are merely disposed to, and those who have become habituated to, melancholy, and that distinction makes good sense of the relationship between the Anatomy's preface and the treatise proper. At the centre of this work is an aetiological analysis which roots the causes of melancholy in ethical decisions. Hence, Burton accords primary therapeutic significance to the management of Galen's so-called six ‘non-naturals’. Against this Galenic regimen is set, though, a recurrent anxiety that melancholy may be intractable. That disquiet is reflected in Burton's use of copia as a device, first, for ‘confining’ melancholy (by recording its every facet), and then for overwriting the anxious fear that it cannot be thus confined (because its mutations are infinite). Uneasiness is further reflected in the constant oscillation between Burton's ‘own’ and ‘Democritus Junior's’ persona, an oscillation which dramatizes Burton's sense of the instability of his own sanity. These stylistic features, then, stand in opposition to the rationalist argument.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.