Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2005 56(226):550-576; doi:10.1093/res/hgi082
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roper, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved

Aeneas and Agathocles in the Exclusion Crisis

Alan Roper

University of California, Los Angeles

The anonymous The Conspiracy of Aeneas & Antenor against the State of Troy (1682) and Thomas Hoy's Agathocles the Sicilian Usurper (1683) are linked by their being written in imitation of Dryden's Absalom and Achitophel and their drawing upon classical rather than biblical history and legend. They also offer fully developed narratives and use their sources to play an English plot against a Trojan or Sicilian one. In doing so, they raise interpretative problems for their readers, including those who annotated copies of the poems when they first appeared. The poems were published during the Exclusion Crisis and within six months of each other, but only The Conspiracy of Aeneas & Antenor directly addresses current issues and events. Hoy uses the life of Agathocles to represent the career of Cromwell and to warn his contemporaries that they are risking another Cromwellian usurpation by their practices. He writes as a Tory, celebrating patriarchal monarchy and the restoration of Charles II, whereas the author of The Conspiracy of Aeneas & Antenor is ambivalent and inclining to Whig. He is, however, hostile to popery and, in contrast to Hoy, flippantly dismissive of Charles II's court.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.