Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2006 57(228):83-105; doi:10.1093/res/hgl023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press 2006; all rights reserved

Orwell and Englishness

Ben Clarke

Taiwan

Accounts of Orwell frequently emphasize the ‘Englishness’ of both the man and his writing. However, ‘Englishness’ was not merely a tradition he drew upon for the forms and values of his work, but one he reinterpreted and exploited for political purposes. His insistence that patriotism could be used by the socialist movement is a distinctive contribution to the effort by sections of the English left to reinterpret national identity and mobilize it against fascism. Orwell selected and combined established images of ‘Englishness’ to figure the English as tolerant, cohesive, and resistant to elaborate theories. His representations of England are, however, contradictory, encompassing a simultaneous commitment to the modern towns of the ‘technical experts’, the urban working class, and the rural order of his Edwardian childhood. The article explores these tensions using the model of the ‘three Englands’ outlined in Priestley's English Journey and argues that, although Orwell's texts remain diverse in their commitments, he suggests that socialism itself will resolve these tensions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.