Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2006 57(229):185-220; doi:10.1093/res/hgl035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press 2006; all rights reserved

The Contemporary Reception of Rochester's A Satyr against Mankind

Nicholas Fisher

Institute of English Studies, University of London

A Satyr against Mankind, with its wide literary and philosophical background, was Rochester's most influential work during his lifetime, and it has survived in more manuscripts than any other poem by him. This article begins by indicating the extensiveness of its impact, in terms of both the sporadic verbal echoes and allusions in Restoration poetry and plays and the responses it evoked, for example, in the Church, through its broader context of defending a heterodox position. Against this background, a detailed examination is made of the four surviving verse answers to the poem: Edward Pococke's An Answer to the Satyr against Mankind, Thomas Lessey's A Satyr. In Answer to the Satyr against Man, and the two anonymous responses An answer to a Sat[?yr against R]eason & Mankind and An Answer to the Satyr, Against Man. Neither the full version of Lessey's poem nor the first of the anonymous responses has been published previously, and transcripts are therefore provided as appendices. These four replies, which vary in scope and length, are shown to cast an unexpectedly valuable light on Rochester's reputation during the last quarter of the seventeenth century.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.