Skip Navigation


The Review of English Studies Advance Access originally published online on January 17, 2007
The Review of English Studies 2006 57(232):766-782; doi:10.1093/res/hgl127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/232/766    most recent
hgl127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Koshi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press 2007; all rights reserved

Editing the Remains of Thomas Traherne

Cedric C. Brown and Tomohiko Koshi

University of Reading


   Abstract

In the light of emerging revisions in the biography of Thomas Traherne, major editorial projects currently under way, and advances in editorial theory, this article offers a fundamental re-assessment of the nature of the text of ‘Poems of Felicity’, the posthumous sequence of religious lyrics assembled by his brother Philip in the early years of the eighteenth century. This notorious case of fraternal re-writing, much vilified in the twentieth century, is contextualised by comparing the biases of early eighteenth-century attempts to publish the remains of Traherne with those of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The article recognises the act of collection as one of appropriation, and looks for apparent acts of anticipating and directing reader-response. What emerges is the clear impossibility of reconstructing an ur-text, especially one driven by an autobiographical model, and the inevitability of taking into account a piece of book-making designed for ‘the public good’.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.