Skip Navigation


The Review of English Studies Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2007
The Review of English Studies 2007 58(237):684-697; doi:10.1093/res/hgm013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/237/684    most recent
hgm013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press 2007; all rights reserved

Who is the Alchemist in Christina Rossetti's ‘The Prince's Progress’?

Simon Humphries

Trinity College, Oxford


   Abstract

Recent criticism of Christina Rossetti's major fairy-tale narrative poems ‘Goblin Market’ and ‘The Prince's Progress’ has demonstrated the importance of understanding their religious symbolism. In this light, ‘The Prince's Progress’ has been read not only as an ironic tale of an individual pilgrim's progress, but also as structured upon a scheme of historical progress—from the transgression in paradise of Genesis through to the renewal of Revelation. Yet it has proved difficult to incorporate the poem's most extended episode, that of the alchemist, into this historical scheme. This article, by tracing the biblical and literary sources of this figure, argues that the alchemist is an embodiment of the old dispensation of ‘the Jews’, or of ‘the law’, in the historical scheme of Christian supersessionist theology. This provides strong support for that critical tradition in which the poem is to be understood ultimately in religious terms. But this article also argues that the supposition that the characters within the narratives of ‘Goblin Market’ and ‘The Prince's Progress’ are themselves capable of the symbolic interpretation of events—a supposition that is becoming critical orthodoxy—rests on an understanding of Rossetti's symbolic method in these poems which is wholly mistaken.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.