Skip Navigation


The Review of English Studies Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2007
The Review of English Studies 2008 59(239):255-269; doi:10.1093/res/hgm053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/239/255    most recent
hgm053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Es, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press 2007; all rights reserved

Michael Drayton, Literary History and Historians in Verse

Bart Van Es


  Abstract

In or around 1621, Michael Drayton penned his well-known assessment of fellow poet Samuel Daniel, whom he described as ‘too much Historian in verse’. This article investigates that dismissal, arguing that behind it lies a long-standing and consistent literary position. Drayton's vision was of a literature that combined both poetry and history. That vision had been presented first in the Heroicall Epistles of 1597, which opened by responding directly to Daniel's Complaint of Rosamond. The Epistles were innovative in applying the structure of Ovid's Heroides to the vernacular tradition of the Mirror for Magistrates. As a result, Drayton highlighted a newly explicit interaction between literary and historical texts. More dangerously, he also presented individual epistles as moral counsel for his patrons. These qualities made the Epistles an enormous popular success. Yet they are also likely to have caused offence, above all to the dedicatee of the first set of letters: Lucy, Countess of Bedford. Setting wider literary trends alongside Drayton's personal experience of patronage, this article offers a new perspective on the development and decline of history in verse.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.