Skip Navigation


The Review of English Studies Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2009
The Review of English Studies 2009 60(245):382-405; doi:10.1093/res/hgn108
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/245/382    most recent
hgn108v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanham, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press 2009; all rights reserved

C. L. Kingsford: The Stonor Letters, and Two Chronicles

Alison Hanham

Palmerston North, New Zealand


   Abstract

Norman Davis's edition of the Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century, now completed by Richard Beadle and Colin Richmond, with a long-awaited glossary, enables linguists and historians to read for the first time what the Pastons and their correspondents actually wrote. No such authority attaches to the edition of the Stonor Letters and Papers, 1290-1483, which C. L. Kingsford offered in 1919. All too often, Kingsford's texts seriously misrepresent their originals. In one or two cases, a transcript owed everything to the copyist's imagination. In others, Kingsford printed readings that made no sense, without investigating their accuracy. His errors were perpetuated in the re-issue of the work that was published in 1996 as Kingsford's Stonor Letters and Papers, 1290–1483. At his time, Kingsford was the leading authority on fifteenth-century English history and historical writings, and some of his assumptions in English Historical Literature in the Fifteenth Century (1913) remain unchallenged. Two are here re-assessed in the light of a closer examination of the texts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.