Skip Navigation



The Review of English Studies Advance Access published online on October 20, 2009

The Review of English Studies, doi:10.1093/res/hgp073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohlmann, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press 2009; all rights reserved

‘Men of Sobriety and Buisnes’: Pepys, Privacy and Public Duty

Benjamin Kohlmann

Lincoln College, Oxford


   Abstract

This article engages with the critical assumption that the Diary of Samuel Pepys, because it was penned in the privacy of his chamber, should serve as a prime exhibit of the emerging discourse of bourgeois subjectivity. Interpretations which stress the Diary’s textual rendering of a private self most notably neglect Pepys’s keen sense of playing an active part in the social and political changes which swept England in the middle of the seventeenth century. Drawing on a range of contextual material, both literary and historical, the present reading locates the Diary in the context of early modern administrative professionalisation. It proposes that we read the Diary in relation to Pepys’s emerging sense of public duty as well as to his ‘business’ and professional ‘sobriety’ as a civil servant. ‘Sobriety’ and ‘business’, this article suggests, were part of a post-Interregnum ‘cultural lexicon’ (in Quentin Skinner’s sense) which allowed a new generation of professionalised civil servants to articulate their distinct contribution to the ‘business of the Kingdom’. The two terms converge on the notion of a ‘public’ self which fundamentally shapes the Diary’s much-discussed rhetoric of privacy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.