Skip Navigation

The Review of English Studies 2006 57(228):64-82; doi:10.1093/res/hgl022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gribben, C. R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press 2006; all rights reserved

The Literary Cultures of the Scottish Reformation

C. R. A. Gribben

University of Manchester

Throughout the twentieth century Scottish literary studies was dominated by a critical consensus, engineered by Edwin Muir and Hugh MacDiarmid, which addressed the anti-Catholic atmosphere of early twentieth-century Scotland by rereading the reformation. Previously, Scotland and Scottishness had been regularly identified as ‘Protestant’; for Muir and MacDiarmid, the reformation instead became the moment when the rich culture of medieval Scotland was replaced by an anti-aesthetic tyranny of life and letters. ‘Authentic’ Scottish literature has therefore repeatedly been defined in opposition to the Scottish Calvinism that appears at its heart. This consensus appears increasingly untenable. This article traces the impact of this anti-theological bias, linking the Muir–MacDiarmid thesis with the continuing neglect of writing by early modern Scottish women. It then surveys relevant genres, arguing that a large proportion of early modern writing can usefully be described as ‘theological’. The article suggests that antipathy towards theological concerns occludes significant writing across a wider range of letters than the Muir–MacDiarmid thesis initially indicated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.