Skip Navigation



The Review of English Studies Advance Access published online on August 16, 2007
The Review of English Studies, doi:10.1093/res/hgm041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/239/219    most recent
hgm041v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press 2007; all rights reserved

Three Disputed Shakespeare Readings: Associations and Contexts

Macdonald P. Jackson

University of Auckland


  Abstract

Preparing a critical edition of a Shakespeare play necessarily entails selecting from among variants preserved in the earliest printed texts or later proposed as conjectural emendations. This article examines one problematic passage in Romeo and Juliet (II.ii.26–32 in The Riverside Shakespeare) and two in Hamlet (I.iv.36–8 and II.ii.174–86) and argues that in each case nearly all recent editors have made the wrong choice. The arguments for the readings supported here rest on their relevance to the immediate context and on their complex associations with similar passages in other Shakespeare plays. Special attention is paid to the nature of the imagery.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.